Sheikh Mohammed of the U.A.E meets Obama read the part about Jonathan Cooke

 

Arab moneybag and Obama meet in the Oval Office 

WASHINGTON // Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces, met privately yesterday with President Barack Obama, concluding a four-day visit to Washington.

Sheikh Mohammed and President Obama discussed the broad and deepening relations uniting the US and the UAE, pledging to continue their close cooperation on security, economic and energy .

The Crown Prince applauded Mr Obama’s strong support for the US-UAE Bilateral Agreement for Peaceful Nuclear Cooperation, better known as the 123 Agreement, which the president submitted to Congress in May. He also expressed his hope that Congress will approve the agreement, acknowledging the UAE as a model for the peaceful development of nuclear energy.

Congress is currently considering the nuclear accord, which has been firmly backed by members of the cabinet. The 123 agreement is likely to come into force on October 17, paving the way for the peaceful exchange of nuclear technology and know-how between the two countries. Sheikh Mohammed also thanked the Mr Obama for his support in the UAE’s bid to host the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) headquarters, which will be housed in Abu Dhabi’s Masdar City.

Sheikh Mohammed and Mr Obama underscored the strong commitment to a stable and peaceful Middle East, lauding two nations’ strategic and military cooperation in the region. They agreed on the importance of working together to support the rebuilding of Iraq, stabilising Afghanistan and Pakistan and eradicating extremism.

The Crown Prince also welcomed the US administration’s commitment to working with both sides of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to find a solution, and emphasised the UAE’s willingness to continue to play a leading role in promoting a peaceful resolution of the conflict.

 Please click on the link.

Now  the Jonathan Cooke author: 


Cook's thesis in the essay, as identified as reviewer Gabriel Ash, is that, "the goal of Israeli policy is to make Palestine and the Palestinians disappear for good."First one must understand who Cooke is.

Jonathan Cooke writing in the same UAE newspaper:  


Please click on that link to read Cooke's hateful article.
Arabs In Israel Plan to Stike October 1st 

The point is this the U.S. is shifting its foreign policy and befriending countries like the U.A.E. who appear on the surface as civil and can bring peace to the table. But in reality as we see they are inciteful anti-Zionist hateful Arabs. Now that Israeli Arabs control 28% of Israel's education K-12 and have no Zionist education, no military duties, no attachment to the State, then of course parties like Beytenu, a coalition partner with Likud, will want the Israel Arabs gone. Just as they want all other anti-Zionist groups gone.

So Obama, while it sure does look like you are playing nice with moneybags who are raping the American consumer at the pump, you are also colluding with the enemies of the State of Israel.

South African Jews Look for Support against antisemitism

 President Zuma seems ready to embrace the Jews of South Africa

Johannesburg — When Jacob Zuma, South Africa’s new president, appeared before the country’s premier Jewish umbrella group in late August, the audience before him was concerned about the tack his government might be taking not just toward Israel, but also toward South African Jews who support it.

Just two weeks before the August 29 meeting, the Palestinian Solidarity Committee of South Africa lodged war crimes charges with the police and the Justice Ministry against 70 South Africans for their alleged involvement in Israel’s military campaign in Gaza last winter.

Unlike the United States, where both the group and its charge might be seen as marginal, here the action attracted the backing of Ronnie Kasrils, a Jewish hero of the South African anti-apartheid struggle who until last year was the country’s intelligence minister. At a press conference tied to the action, Kasrils, who remains a prominent member of Zuma’s own African National Congress party, called on the government “to investigate and, if appropriate, [to] prosecute in South Africa individuals involved in war crimes and crimes against humanity during Israel’s Operation Cast Lead,” as the Gaza campaign has been dubbed by Israel.
But Zuma, in a speech warmly received by his audience, enveloped the community in a pragmatic embrace that explicitly eschewed the anti-Zionist tendencies of some parts of his own base.

“This country has a massive skills shortage as a result of decades of neglect and deliberate underinvestment,” Zuma said in his address to an audience of about 800 at the 54th National Conference of the Jewish Board of Deputies. Consistent with broader initiatives to encourage South African ex-patriates to return to South Africa and help build the country’s nascent democracy, Zuma alluded to the shrinkage through emigration of the South African Jewish community to 80,000 today from 120,000 a generation ago. Noting “the emigration of skilled people” from South Africa, he said, “We must work to reverse the trend. The message we want to send to people who have left the country to live and work abroad is that South Africa will always remain their home, and I will always welcome whatever contribution they can make to building this nation.”

When it came to policy, in his speech, Zuma
pointedly rejected any hint of support for dismantling Israel or staking out a militant stance against it.
Instead, he reconfirmed his government’s commitment to Washington’s goal of a two-state solution to the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians.
“We support the position of the United Nations and the Middle East Quartet that the only viable solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is one that ends the occupation that began in 1967,” Zuma told the Jewish gathering. “It is a solution which fulfills the aspirations of both parties for independent homelands through two states for two peoples — Israel and an independent, adjoining and viable state of Palestine living side by side in peace and security.

“We will continue to offer whatever assistance we can towards the resolution of this matter, including sharing our experience in ending apartheid through negotiation,” said Zuma. “In this respect, we would like to work together with the South African Jewish community.”

For South African Jews, Zuma’s message was clear: You are safe and welcome here. “As president,” he stressed, “I regard as one of my duties the need to preserve the unity of this nation, and to cultivate its diversity. We must remain on guard against any manifestations of antisemitism and other intolerances.”
But in a country where charges of “apartheid” against Israel for its policies toward Palestinians carry enormous emotional punch, it remains to be seen whether the president’s message—delivered within the Jewish community and not more broadly—will be enough. For many, the Palestinian Solidarity Committee of South Africa’s action revived memories of other recent tactics designed both to pressure Israel and to discourage South African Jews from supporting it.

Last February, workers affiliated with the Congress of South African Trade Unions— an important component of the ANC — refused to offload a ship carrying Israeli goods in the harbor of Durban. Working in partnership with the PSCSA, COSATU, which helped lead the struggle against apartheid in South Africa, announced the beginning of an anti-apartheid style sanctions campaign against Israel, saying it would pressure the government to sever diplomatic and trade relations with Israel.

The next day, 200 supporters of COSATU and the PSCSA demonstrated outside the offices of the South African Jewish Board of Deputies. Addressing the protesters, Kasrils, again, compared “Israel’s massacre in Gaza” to genocide. The former government minister insisted that the demonstrators were not targeting South African Jewry but rather Zionism, the Israeli government and its supporters. But the march on the Jewish communal organization’s headquarters rather than the Israeli Embassy signified to many Jewish observers an attack on the Jewish community itself.

One month before this, many Jews were also unsettled when then-deputy foreign minister Fatima Hajaig told a cheering crowd, “The control of America, just like the control of most Western countries, is in the hands of Jewish money.”

Hajaig apologized to the Cabinet for her statement after the Jewish Board of Deputies lodged a complaint of hate speech against her with the South African Human Rights Commission. Due to the legacy of apartheid, South African constitutional protections of free speech do not extend to hate speech. The board of deputies then withdrew its complaint.

But Zuma, in contrast to such instances of hostility, altered his original schedule on the night of his speech before the Jewish Board of Deputies in order to stay for the entire evening’s program. As a consequence, the line-up was altered so that other speakers appeared earlier, in accordance with protocols that call for the president to always conclude an event.

Among other things, this allowed Zuma to hear the evening’s second keynoter, former Canadian Justice Minister Irwin Cotler — a prominent human rights lawyer and notable advocate for Israel. Cotler, who met with Zuma and Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development Jeff Radebe before the opening of the conference, stressed that, through the history of anti-apartheid struggle that had shaped it, South Africa could be a moral force in the international community.

Citing South Africa’s constitution, Cotler said, “I know of no other charter of rights in the world that speaks so comprehensively about rights, because it was anchored in the inequality that was previously experienced.”

In a separate interview with the Forward, Cotler said: “I think they are giving expression to this [human rights commitment] on the domestic level. I found both President Zuma and the minister of justice committed to doing the right thing for the South African people. The country has a lot to teach other democratic rights-protecting societies, including Canada, about what they are doing in the justice agenda, in gender equality, in protecting the vulnerable and in anti-discrimination law and policy.”

Cotler wondered whether South Africa’s leaders would exercise their moral authority similarly on the world stage. The government, for example, recently refused to admit into the country the Dalai Lama, the Tibetan exile leader, due to pressure from China. “South Africa has to take its place on the world stage and speak with moral authority on the great issues of the day to advance the international human rights and justice agenda,” Cotler said. “I believe that they will have the moral voice to provide that moral leadership internationally.”

In his earlier talk with Zuma, Cotler asked the president for South Africa’s support in censuring Iran at the U.N. The censure motion, co-sponsored annually by Canada at the U.N. General Assembly, has not been supported by South Africa in the past. But in the wake of the beatings, mass arrests and allegations of torture by Iranian government agents after Iran’s disputed election last June, “I would hope to see a change not only in South Africa’s voting patterns at the U.N., but also in its public advocacy,” Cotler told the Forward.
For now, Zuma largely impressed his South African audience. “The most positive thing, which particularly impressed people, was that Zuma stayed the whole night,” said Zev Krengel, the board of deputies’ national chairman. “It showed people he is prepared to engage.”

Marlene Bethlehem, a past chair of the umbrella group, agreed. “Listening to Cotler, his body language was totally engaged,” she noted.
Avrom Krengel, chair of the South African Zionist Federation, added: “His speech was as balanced as any you would get out of a government official. It was a very carefully calibrated statement of South African government policy designed for our audience, neither to cause offense nor to divert from South Africa’s stated policies. It spelled out South Africa’s support for a peaceful settlement, said that the occupation must end, there must be a two-state solution and that South Africa is here to help.”

It was also notable to some that when he named the many Jews prominent in the anti-apartheid struggle, Zuma omitted mention of Kasrils.

Still, some were concerned by his failure to comment directly on the fact that a former government official was promoting prosecution of South Africans for war crimes.

“He should have addressed the war crimes situation more explicitly,” Bethlehem said.
But Krengel did not agree. “The war crimes thing was a big story in our lives, but nothing in the life of the nation where you have taxi drivers striking and soldiers mutineering,” he said.

Forward

ADL Investigation Reveals Strain of Anti-Semitism in Extreme Factions of the Anti-Abortion Movement

 

While I do not agree with abortion, certainly killing Jewish Dr.s is antisemitism

New York, NY, October 30, 1998…A strain of anti-Semitism runs through the extreme factions of the anti-abortion movement, according to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). In the days following the fatal shooting of Dr. Barnett Slepian, a Buffalo, NY gynecologist-obstetrician who performed abortions, speculation has surfaced as to whether Dr. Slepian may have been targeted because he was a Jew. Four of the five abortion providers shot by a sniper or snipers in Canada and the United States since 1994 have been Jewish.
"While there is no evidence to suggest that anti-Semitism was a motive for the attacks, we are deeply concerned about the strain of anti-Semitism running through some extreme factions of the movement," said Abraham H. Foxman ADL National Director. "They make insidious claims that Jewish doctors control the practice and industry of abortion, often comparing them to Nazi war criminals." He named Human Life International, a major anti-abortion group with a history of anti-Semitism, as ‘inordinately preoccupied with Jews."
Mr. Foxman added that "hideous and offensive" comparisons to the Holocaust were regularly made by some groups to manipulate emotions. "Whatever one’s position on this heartrending issue, analogizing abortion to the Nazi government’s campaign to murder every Jew in the world diminishes the truth of the Holocaust and implies that ordinary women engaging in a lawful act are Nazis."
Five days after Dr. Slepian’s murder, an anonymous caller threatened the life of another Buffalo-area obstetrician who performed abortions. Authorities believe the caller previously slipped a "wanted poster" of Dr. Slepian into a police station, apparently in the station washroom. Slepian’s face had been crossed out and the words "Jew" and "killer" were written across the photo.
While most of the organized anti-abortion movement decries bigotry and violence, ADL’s investigation revealed that some anti-abortion groups and a few individuals, along with some extremist anti-Semitic groups, single out Jewish doctors who perform the procedure or describe Jews as controlling the abortion "industry."
Followings are some examples of the use anti-Semitism and the Holocaust by anti-abortion extremists:

• Human Life International (HLI), a Virginia-based anti-abortion group, has singled out Jews as disproportionately responsible for, even controlling, the abortion-rights movement. The organization’s founder, Father Paul Marx, wrote as long ago as 1977: "I do not blame the Jews for the abortion movement. I do say, and will say because it is the truth, that it is a strange thing how many leaders in the abortion movement are Jewish." Marx supported his observation by noting, "A famous genetics professor in Paris told me that the leaders of the abortion movement in France were Jewish. I saw one, a Jewish female liar, do her thing on behalf of abortion at the World Population Conference in Bucharest." Marx also stated: "The fact is, I am surprised and shocked by the number of Jews who lead the abortion movement in so many countries after their horrendous experience with Hitler…. My medical friends, and I have many, have told me again and again how many Jewish doctors do abortions freely. From a highly reliable source in a city I shall not name for the moment, I learned of a Jewish doctor who does sixteen abortions every Saturday morning for $300.00 each."
  A decade later, in a 1987 newsletter, Marx charged: "There’s a most ironic side to the widespread, furious objections of some Jews (and others) to Pope John Paul II’s routine diplomatic reception of Austrian President Kurt Waldheim: the same segment of the Jewish community that accuses the Pope of insensitivity to the Jewish Holocaust not only condones but has more or less led the greatest holocaust of all time, the war on babies.
  "It’s obvious to anyone who’s studied the abortion movement in the Western world as long as I have (25 years), that a large segment of the Jews that is disloyal to the teachings of Judaism more or less leads the abortion movement."
  In 1993, an article in HLI’s newsletter declared: "Today, certain members of this people whose ancient religion and culture managed to survive Auschwitz and Buchenwald are presiding over the greatest Holocaust in the history of the world. American Jews have been leaders in establishing and defending the efficient destruction of more than 30 million preborn children in this country….Why are the victims of one Holocaust perpetrating another?"
  
• In 1995, a local Virginia group, Project Life-Nova circulated flyers that compared Jewish abortion providers with Nazi war criminals. The flyers were headlined "not wanted in our community," and included doctors’ photographs, home phone numbers and addresses, birthdates, spouses’ names. While not all the doctors targeted were Jewish, only the flyers depicting Jewish doctors included a paragraph about the Holocaust – asserting that the Nazis provided abortion for Jewish women as part of their extermination campaign, and that abortion was prosecuted at Nuremberg as a war crime. The flyers called on the doctors to "repent before God."

• Following a murderous attack on a Brookline, Massachusetts, clinic in 1994, an administrator at the clinic stated that it had previously received bomb threats and hate mail. "That was all really routine….The hate mail was really graphic, really violent. It usually centered on killing Jew doctors. It said things like, ‘Hitler was right.’ There were really grisly drawings."

Abortion and the Holocaust
Many groups and activists within the anti-abortion movement draw analogies between abortion and the Holocaust. This practice ranges from invoking a comparison to reproducing photographs of Jewish corpses alongside those of aborted fetuses to naming an anti-abortion web site "The American Holocaust Memorial." Examples include:

• "The American Holocaust Memorial" web site is dedicated to "uncovering" the "frightening correlation between the American holocaust of abortion and the NAZI holocaust of World War II." Gruesome photographs of slaughtered Jews and dismembered fetuses are compared in order to demonstrate that "the ‘Pro-Choice’ campaign [is] a thinly veiled ‘Final Solution’ for the unwanted unborn child."
  
• "The Nuremberg Files," also a web site, calls itself "a coalition of concerned citizens throughout the USA…cooperating in collecting dossiers on abortionists in anticipation that one day we may be able to hold them on trial for crimes against humanity." It states that many Nazi war criminals avoided punishment for their crimes due to lack of evidence, and "we do not want the same thing to happen when the day comes to charge abortionists with their crimes."
  The site provides a mailing address and asks viewers to collect and submit "evidence" – including any personal information, videotapes or photos, criminal records, and affidavits by former employees or spouses – about doctors who perform abortions and others involved in safeguarding abortion for women who choose it.
  Stating that its goal is "to record the name of every person working in the baby slaughter business across the United States of America," the site includes a list, under a graphic of dripping blood, of the names of abortion doctors, clinic owners and workers, allegedly sympathetic judges, politicians, and law enforcement authorities, and "miscellaneous spouses & other blood flunkies." A line is drawn through the names of the doctors and other personnel who have been murdered.
  

Extremist Groups

• The Posse Comitatus, an anti-Semitic organization whose anti-government views have been influential in the militia movement, reported the Slepian killing on its web site, then stated: "Not much needs to be said. The justice in the ‘putting to DEATH’ of this jewish [sic] abortionist says it all!…. You can be sure that it is a White Man, one of His True Chosen, that is exacting YHVH’s vengeance upon these murdering vipers! I Pray that other True Israelite Warriors across this land continue to rid our country of these murdering bastards!"
  
• Holy War, an Oslo-based Internet hate site that posts English-language web pages, also merges an anti-abortion viewpoint with anti-Semitism. It calls abortion "the one and only ‘Holocaust’ ever!" and exhorts readers to "Stop the ‘racist Jewish’ abortion industry that cost [sic] the life of 50 million human beings every year!"
  

The Anti-Defamation League, founded in 1913, is the world's leading organization fighting anti-Semitism through programs and services that counteract hatred, prejudice and bigotry.

The Zionist Melting Pot Boils Over

Israeli schools have no Zionist curriculum in 48% of the classes. Here is a rundown on the State of Israel's K - 12 educational system and why it is a threat to the core values of the State. Can Israel survive when the population rebels against Zionism?

Good Fences

By J.J. Goldberg

Published September 02, 2009, issue of September 11, 2009.

Whatever the immediate issues, though, the underlying cause of conflict is the same: demographic change. A study of Israel’s school population, released August 30 by the respected Taub Center for Social Policy Studies, showed that of the country’s 1.6 million schoolchildren, fully 48% attend schools that do not embrace or teach the state’s founding Zionist ethos, including 28% in Arab schools and 20% in Haredi schools. The combined total was 39% back in the year 2000. The Haredi schools do not even teach basic skills for employment in a modern economy, the study noted.

Please read the entire article by clicking on the Published link above.

Rioters rampage in Budapest’s Jewish district

September 6, 2009

BUDAPEST (JTA) – A crowd of 500 demonstrators, including neo-Nazis and skinheads, rampaged in Budapest's Jewish district.

Hungarian riot police deployed tear gas and baton charges Saturday against the vociferously xenophobic crowd as it tried to disrupt Hungary's annual Gay Pride parade.

More than 30 arrests were made on charges including possession of offensive weapons and riotous behavior. Heightened surveillance was enforced throughout the day to prevent a recurrence of the mayhem that ended last year‘s parade, in which there were more than a dozen serious injuries, according to Éva Tafferner, press officer at Budapest police headquarters.

The rioters invaded the heart of the traditional Jewish Ghetto District, started a small fire, tore down signs and shouted threatening anti-Semitic vitriol. The attacks were witnessed by families of foreign Jews visiting the district for the current Budapest Jewish Cultural Festival.

One British tourist trying to argue with the rioters at the edge of the ghetto had to be rescued by police when he was verbally abused and physically assaulted by a gang of 20 attackers. A policeman who tried to break up a confrontation not far from there was knocked to the ground and kicked, as was a woman displaying a Gay Pride T-shirt while standing alone at a tram stop.

The parade drew support from artists, politicians and human rights organizations in many countries. An anti-fascist organization in neighboring Austria sent busloads of activists who marched beneath a giant rainbow flag.

Former Hungarian Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsány, who took part in the parade, declared: “All free citizens must defend human rights.”

Anti-Zionism is more dangerous than anti-Semitism, threatening lives and peace in the Middle East.

Anti-Zionism is in many ways more dangerous than anti-Semitism.

First, anti-Zionism targets the most vulnerable part of the Jewish people, namely, the Jewish population of Israel, whose physical safety and personal dignity depend crucially on maintaining Israel's sovereignty. Put bluntly, the anti-Zionist plan to do away with Israel condemns 5 1/2 million human beings, mostly refugees or children of refugees, to eternal defenselessness in a region where genocidal designs are not uncommon.

Secondly, modern society has developed antibodies against anti-Semitism but not against anti-Zionism. Today, anti-Semitic stereotypes evoke revulsion in most people of conscience, while anti-Zionist rhetoric has become a mark of academic sophistication and social acceptance in certain extreme yet vocal circles of U.S. academia and media elite. Anti-Zionism disguises itself in the cloak of political debate, exempt from sensitivities and rules of civility that govern inter-religious discourse, to attack the most cherished symbol of Jewish identity.

Finally, anti-Zionist rhetoric is a stab in the back to the Israeli peace camp, which overwhelmingly stands for a two-state solution. It also gives credence to enemies of coexistence who claim that the eventual elimination of Israel is the hidden agenda of every Palestinian.

It is anti-Zionism, then, not anti-Semitism that poses a more dangerous threat to lives, historical justice and the prospects of peace in the Middle East.

Judea Pearl is a professor at UCLA and the president of the Daniel Pearl Foundation. Copyright © 2009, The Los Angeles Times

More Hate from York University

http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=127582934557

Meir Weinstein September 5 at 8:13pm Reply

Attention: The President of York University, Mr. M. Shoukri,

It has come to the attention of the Jewish Defence League of Canada that filmmaker and York University Professor John Greyson has withdrawn his short film Covered from the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) in protest over the inaugural City to City program on Tel Aviv.

Toronto film festival ignites anti-Israel boycott - Washington Times

This is what York University Professor John Greyson had to say: "Isn't such an uncritical celebration of Tel Aviv right now akin to celebrating Montgomery buses in 1963, California grapes in 1969, Chilean wines in 1973, Nestles infant formula in 1984, or South Africa..... I'm helping organize a screening in September for the Toronto Palestinian Film Festival, co-sponsored by Queers Against Israeli Apartheid and the Inside Out Festival."

The Toronto Palestine Film Festival's opening night will take place on September 26th, the Jewish Day of Atonement, Yom Kippur.

It will be important to monitor the classes taught by York University Professor John Greyson. In the most recent past, some anti Israel professor's from York University have used racism against Jewish students. Please take action.

Thank you,

Meir Weinstein National Director Jewish Defence League of Canada

www.jdl-canada.com

What is "New antisemitism"

Recently, I was taken aback when a chasid began his anti-Zionist lecture during a normal conversation. It made me think, is anti-Zionism a form of anti-Semitism? Since Israel is a relatively new State, while traditional antiSemitism has been around for hundreds of years, certainly there is a "new antisemitism." Here is a bit of my research.

I am beginning my education. Here is my first lesson in the new anti-Semitism.

Traditional Jews Are Not Zionists

Although there are those who refuse to accept the teachings of our Rabbis and will continue to support the Zionist state, there are also many who are totally unaware of the history of Zionism and its contradiction to the beliefs of Torah-True Jews.

Zionism and Current Events

We provide articles on current Zionist activities with the response of True Torah Jews, as well as articles on the latest anti-Zionist activities.

Central Rabbinical Congress of the U.S.A. and Canada

The Most Difficult Place for Jews to Live Today is in the So-Called “Jewish State”

The Israeli government and the Jerusalem municipal government are committing Nazi-style acts of brutality against religious Jews on a scale not seen in the last 65 years. Religious Jews are regularly beaten mercilessly for yelling “Shabbos” at demonstrations, called by the chief rabbis of Jerusalem, against the parking lot set up by the city government right next to the walls of the Old City. They are inviting Sabbath-desecrators from the entire country to come to the Holy City, the palace of G-d, the place where the Divine Presence resides, to insult G-d, who warned in His Torah against the desecration of the Sabbath.

According to the Talmud, Sabbath-desecration was one of the reasons why Jerusalem was destroyed 2000 years ago. But today, when religious Jews in Jerusalem shout the word “Shabbos”, they are beaten and attacked by the Israeli police. The police shoot grenades and tear gas bombs at the defenseless protesters.

This wave of brutality reached its peak this past Friday night, August 28, when a police officer directed a driver stopped at a traffic light to proceed, although the officer was aware of the religious Jew lying under his car. The driver obeyed, injuring the man and dragging his body some distance along the road.

This crime was repeated on Sunday, August 30, at a demonstration staged by religious Jews to protest the desecration of the body of a Jewish man stabbed to death the previous night. The cause of death was clear and according to Jewish law, there was no justification to perform an autopsy. America and other countries take into account the sensitivities of religious Jews in such cases, but not the Israeli Nazis. At the demonstration against the autopsy, a police officer deliberately ran over one of the protestors, seriously wounding him.

Where else but the Zionist state could a government take a Jewish mother to court claiming that she wanted to starve and murder her sick child, for whom she cared with selfless dedication? In this nightmare, reminiscent of the blood libels of the Middle Ages, a mother criticized the staff of a hospital and blamed them for her child’s worsening condition, whereupon they falsely accused her and had her thrown her in jail together with criminals, lying on the floor for ten days as the police attempted to force her to confess to the charges. But she held strong and refused, until the court, under enormous public pressure, ordered the police to free her. She ran home to her children, including the sick child, whom she hadn’t seen in weeks. Now the state is threatening again to take her children away from her; a higher court has taken on the case.

The Israeli press pounced on this opportunity to defame religious Jews. Even before the court ruled, they were already waging a propaganda war against her and all religious mothers.

In which country in the world do religious Jews suffer as much persecution as in the state that calls itself “Israel”? What other country in the world cuts up Jewish bodies and unearths Jewish graves, in total disregard for Jewish history?

And this is the state that dares to call itself a Jewish state?

Torah Jews are opposed to Zionist sovereignty over Jerusalem and the entire Holy Land. We proclaim our loyalty to America and President Obama, whom the Zionists oppose for his sincere efforts to bring peace to the Middle East. In light of recent events, we can say definitively that Jews fare better under the American government than under the Zionists.
For More Information, Please Visit Information, Please Visit
www.jewsagainstzionism.com